<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beats a reference cursor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mclaughlinsoftware.com/2009/03/19/beats-a-reference-cursor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mclaughlinsoftware.com/2009/03/19/beats-a-reference-cursor/</link>
	<description>Michael McLaughlin's Technical Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:08:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maclochlainn</title>
		<link>http://blog.mclaughlinsoftware.com/2009/03/19/beats-a-reference-cursor/comment-page-1/#comment-1533</link>
		<dc:creator>maclochlainn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mclaughlinsoftware.com/?p=2088#comment-1533</guid>
		<description>Great reference article, Thanks. It looks like the only serious downside exists for wide record sets, but I went through it pretty quickly. If I missed something, let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great reference article, Thanks. It looks like the only serious downside exists for wide record sets, but I went through it pretty quickly. If I missed something, let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Neumueller</title>
		<link>http://blog.mclaughlinsoftware.com/2009/03/19/beats-a-reference-cursor/comment-page-1/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Neumueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mclaughlinsoftware.com/?p=2088#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>I agree that pipelined table functions are a nice addition to the developer toolchest. There are some issues to remember, however:

A typical pipelined table function requires 2 additional object types, the result table type and it&#039;s record type. You can create them by hand or let Oracle automatically build them if the function&#039;s return type is declared in a pl/sql package spec.

I&#039;d also bet that selecting from pipelined table functions is a little bit slower than using ref cursors, pl/sql functions which return pl/sql tables or using procedures with out parameters (which can be pl/sql tables, too).

Adrian Billington &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oracle-developer.net/display.php?id=423&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote&lt;/a&gt; about pipelined function issues some time ago, where he analyzes potential problems in much more detail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that pipelined table functions are a nice addition to the developer toolchest. There are some issues to remember, however:</p>
<p>A typical pipelined table function requires 2 additional object types, the result table type and it&#8217;s record type. You can create them by hand or let Oracle automatically build them if the function&#8217;s return type is declared in a pl/sql package spec.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also bet that selecting from pipelined table functions is a little bit slower than using ref cursors, pl/sql functions which return pl/sql tables or using procedures with out parameters (which can be pl/sql tables, too).</p>
<p>Adrian Billington <a href="http://www.oracle-developer.net/display.php?id=423" rel="nofollow">wrote</a> about pipelined function issues some time ago, where he analyzes potential problems in much more detail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
