MacLochlainns Weblog

Michael McLaughlin's Technical Blog

Site Admin

Archive for January, 2010

Decoding 1005 on MySQL

with 17 comments

If you’re using referential integrity on MySQL, you can easily run into this error with the InnoDB engine. It frequently seems to occur with an ALTER TABLE statement. It can mean many things but typically it means the data types don’t match between the foreign key and primary key column. Likewise, it can mean one of the column data types disagrees in a multiple-column foreign to multiple-column primary key constraint.

The error by itself isn’t very handy. This is a sample:

ERROR 1005 (HY000): Can't create table 'sampledb.#sql-4a0_2' (errno: 150)

You can try SHOW WARNINGS but you’ll discover more about the error by running the following command as the root superuser:

mysql> SHOW engine innodb STATUS;

It returns a dump of the InnoDB’s activity. You can see it by unfolding the complete log, if you’re interested in the details. The significant part of the log to solve this type of problem is:

100130 17:16:57 Error IN FOREIGN KEY CONSTRAINT OF TABLE sampledb/#sql-4a0_2:
FOREIGN KEY(member_type)
REFERENCES common_lookup(common_lookup_id):
Cannot find an INDEX IN the referenced TABLE WHERE the
referenced COLUMNS appear AS the FIRST COLUMNS, OR COLUMN types

While this is more information, it isn’t necessarily enough to solve the problem when you’re new to MySQL. The first place you should look is whether the data types agree between the foreign key and primary key columns.

The most common variation that I’ve run into is where the primary key column uses a int unsigned data type and the foreign key column uses an int data type. It’s quite nice that the InnoDB Engine stops this cold. Naturally, you fix it by changing the foreign key data type to match the int unsigned data type.

Written by maclochlainn

January 30th, 2010 at 6:58 pm

Posted in InnoDB,MySQL,sql

iPad Thoughts …

with one comment

This is probably defensive because I’ve had to answer the question about two dozen times since the iPad product announcement. The question is naturally, what do yo think about the iPad?

My perspective is biased by the fact that I’ve been using both DOS/Windows PCs and Macs since the 1980s. They each have merits but in short, unlike the media, I have a bias toward Apple products. In fact, I’m an old NeXT system administrator (software gone from the scene because as rumors have it, Steve wouldn’t think of letting the company become ONLY a software company).

I think the idea of the iPad for eBooks is awesome, the features are terrific. It clearly is a better opportunity for my digital movies but a bit awkward because of its size.

I can’t travel with an iPad by itself because it doesn’t support Microsoft Excel, Word, or Visio. That means I’d have to have my MacBook Pro and iPad. Ouch, the security folks will go nuts at the airport, and my bags are now heavier by about 2 pounds. The iPad is 1.5 pounds but the charger has weight too.

I understand all the logic for the device but there’s an underlying assumption in placing everything on the web. Some data can’t be on the web because of legal limits. This goes to my sticking point. Apple’s Office Suite isn’t as robust as Microsoft’s Office Suite. Keynote is easier to use and easily preferred over PowerPoint, but Numbers isn’t even close to Excel (here Apple fails). The problem with Pages is that many companies have templates built around Word and there’s no easy migration back and forth.

Perhaps Apple will reach out to Power Excel users and invest in Numbers to bring it into this millennium; and maybe they’ll also fix the portability between Word and Pages too. For example, one company I work with insists that I use Word 2003 because they’ve never updated their templates to Word 2007 (easy to do through VMWare Fusion). Then, all that’s needed is a rock solid replacement for Visio on Mac OS X.

I think that I might buy one to experiment with, just so I’m current with the product and new features. I’ve also got some product ideas that I’d like to explore but I don’t think this is a home-run like the iPod and iPhone without vitualization software to enable Windows. As an afterthought, maybe the announcement this summer will be “you can have it all now” when they port most features to the core OS X operating system. That would induce me to upgrade my MacBook Pro, wouldn’t it get you to do so too?

Written by maclochlainn

January 29th, 2010 at 2:24 pm

Sample PL/SQL Cursor Loops

with 2 comments

A few of my students wanted me to post sample cursor loops, so here are examples of simple, FOR, and WHILE loops. There are a couple variations on approaches that demonstrate %TYPE and %ROWTYPE anchoring to data dictionary table definitions and local cursors.

Part of the idea behind these examples is to show the basic structure while mimicking the \G option of MySQL. The \G (Go) displays results as a list of column names and values by row. Ever since I discovered that in MySQL, I’ve hoped Oracle would incorporate something similar in their product. While discussing my wish list, I’d also like Oracle to make the FROM dual optional (like MySQL does) when selecting a string or numeric literal. You can find an implementation here, that leverages an example from Tom Kyte.

You can click any of the titles to view the code, which isn’t needed when you don’t have JavaScript enabled or the RSS expands them for you.

I’m sure this will help my students and hope it helps somebody else.

Written by maclochlainn

January 21st, 2010 at 10:53 pm

Haste makes waste, again …

with 5 comments

I was working on a code example for my database class, got in a hurry, and changed a table name without dropping the original table. Oops!

Naturally, I got this error message.

  LOB (administrator_photo) STORE AS admin_photo
ERROR at line 5:
ORA-00955: name IS already used BY an existing object

The LOB segment name existed but why and where. It was in the table that I forgot to drop. This query find the latent table and column while illustrating the relationship (for my students and others) between an OBJECT_NAME and SEGMENT_NAME:

SELECT TABLE_NAME, column_name
FROM   user_lobs
WHERE  segment_name = (SELECT object_name
                       FROM   user_objects
                       WHERE  object_name = UPPER('&object_name')
                       AND    object_type = 'LOB');

Now, I can grab it later because it’ll happen again. 😉 At Samy mentioned in his comment you also have the option of using ALL_ or DBA_ views when you’re a DBA.

Written by maclochlainn

January 5th, 2010 at 10:31 pm

Posted in Oracle,sql