Hidden thought SQL question
I’m always amazed at how people ask questions about skill sets. A few weeks ago, I ran into a neat Oracle SQL question that hinges on whether the individual truly understands One Phase Commit (1PC) and Two Phase Commit (2PC) operations.
It’s a simple question that tests two levels of understanding. The question is:
- If you create table A and insert a row of data and subsequently you create table B and insert a row of data before issuing a ROLLBACK; statement, how many rows of data will you find in table A and table B?
Level 1 Understanding
Here’s the test script:
CREATE TABLE a1 ( text VARCHAR2(12) ); INSERT INTO a1 ( text ) VALUES ('Hello World!'); CREATE TABLE b1 ( text VARCHAR2(12) ); INSERT INTO b1 ( text ) VALUES ('Hello World!'); ROLLBACK; |
The answer is 1 row in table A1 and no row in table B1 because the second CREATE statement issues an implicit COMMIT. However, the INSERT statement to table B1 is a 2PC and the ROLLBACK statement undoes the first phase of the INSERT statement and removes the data. If you were using a sequence value in the INSERT statement, the sequence value would be consumed because it’s not replaced by a ROLLBACK statement.
Level 2 Understanding
Here’s the test script:
CREATE TABLE a2 AS (SELECT 'Hello World!' AS text); CREATE TABLE b2 AS (SELECT 'Hello World!' AS text); ROLLBACK; |
The answer is 1 row in table A2 and 1 row in table B2 because a CREATE statement using the AS clause subquery issues an implicit COMMIT on the data inserted from the subquery because its a 1PC transaction.
Most likely and interviewer would be looking for level one understanding but you can demonstrate mastery by sharing level two understanding. As always, I hope this helps those reading it.