MacLochlainns Weblog

Michael McLaughlin’s Technical Blog

Site Admin

Archive for the ‘Oracle XE’ Category

Oracle 11g XE Delay?

with one comment

Somebody posted a comment inquiring about the release of Oracle 11g XE. They felt it had been delayed. As far as I know, the last word on that came from Andy Mendelsohn last October, as published in this InfoWorld article.

When Andy Mendelsohn originally announced Oracle 11g XE in an interview with the NY Times, he clearly said it would be based on the terminal release of Oracle 11g. I also suspect it’ll include APEX 4.0, which was recently released. Maybe we’ll see the release at or near Oracle Open World 2010.

I don’t endorse the negative remarks in the InfoWorld article about why Oracle 11g XE isn’t released. While I have no direct knowledge of the forthcoming release, I think there’s an alternative explanation for any delay. Based on my involvement with the Oracle 10g XE release, I believe Oracle wants a rock solid starter version. At least, that was a major concern when they released Oracle 10g XE.

Written by maclochlainn

June 28th, 2010 at 1:42 pm

Correlated Update Statement

without comments

My students wanted some additional examples on correlated update statements. I’ve been struggling with what the right way may be to illustrate them.

Correlated subqueries are a hard concept to explain to those new to SQL. While correlated update statements seem impossibly obscure to many or inordinately complex. New SQL developers often flee to the comfort of procedural programs when it comes to update statements.

This uses my video store data model. It’s a correlated update statement to clean up potential corrupt data. More or less something a DBA might run to ensure a business rule hasn’t been violated over time. It checks for the correct foreign key value in a table when a dependent table contains one or more than one row of data.

The aqua-green box highlights a subquery that aggregates foreign key columns and groups the result with the foreign key value. The results from this subquery become a run-time view or derived table. The result set is a foreign key value and a substitute string literal value for each row in the contact table. These results correlate to the update statement’s rows based on the input parameter. The input parameter is a column from each updated row.

A unique key (or check constraint) exists on the combination of the common_lookup_table, common_lookup_column, and common_lookup_type columns. This ensures that only one row is returned and assigned to the member_type column in the member table. The update statement naturally works in either Oracle or MySQL without any porting changes.

While this type of solution is powerful in its own right, I thought it might be interesting to see their procedural equivalents. These correlated subqueries run for each row returned by the master query (or outermost statement). Therefore, they act like functions.

Procedural equivalents (or user-defined functions) simplify the update statement like so:

UPDATE member m
SET    member_type = get_member_type(m.member_id);

If you’re interested in seeing how you would implement this solution in a user-defined function, just expand the dropdown that interest you.

You can query the results of the update statement with the following.

As always, I look forward to helping and gaining insight.

Written by maclochlainn

June 27th, 2010 at 10:12 pm

Show indexes in Oracle

without comments

One of my students asked how you could show index from table_name; in Oracle. They were chagrined when I told them there wasn’t an equivalent command. Outside of using Quest’s Toad or Oracle SQL*Developer, you can query the data catalog, like so:

-- SQL*Plus formatting commands.
COLUMN index_name FORMAT A32
COLUMN column_position FORMAT 999 HEADING "COLUMN|POSITION"
COLUMN column_name FORMAT A32
 
-- Ordinary query with a substitution variable.
SELECT i.index_name
,      ic.column_position
,      ic.column_name
FROM   user_indexes i JOIN user_ind_columns ic
ON     i.index_name = ic.index_name
WHERE  i.table_name = UPPER('&input')

Naturally, this is a subset of what’s returned by the show index from table_name; syntax. There is much more information in these tables but I only wanted to show an example.

The UPPER function command ensures that the table name is found in the database. Unless you’ve created a case sensitive object, they’re stored in uppercase strings.

While a single SQL statement works well, a little organization in PL/SQL makes it more readable. A display_indexes function provides that organization. It only displays normal indexes, not LOB indexes, and it depends on a schema-level collection of strings. This is the user-defined type (UDT) that I used for the collection.

CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE index_table AS TABLE OF VARCHAR2(200);
/

The following is the definition of the function:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION display_indexes
( pv_table_name VARCHAR2 ) RETURN INDEX_TABLE IS
 
  -- Declare an iterator for the collection return variable.
  index_counter  NUMBER := 1;
  column_counter NUMBER;
 
  -- Declare and initialize local collection variable as return type.
  index_desc INDEX_TABLE := index_table();
 
  -- Get indexes.
  CURSOR index_name (cv_table_name VARCHAR2) IS
    SELECT   i.index_name
    FROM     user_indexes i
    WHERE    i.table_name = cv_table_name
    AND      i.index_type = 'NORMAL'
    ORDER BY 1;
 
  -- Get index columns.    
  CURSOR index_columns (cv_index_name VARCHAR2) IS
    SELECT   ic.column_position
    ,        ic.column_name
    FROM     user_ind_columns ic
    WHERE    ic.index_name = cv_index_name
    ORDER BY 1;
 
BEGIN
 
  -- Assign the table name to the collection.
  index_desc.EXTEND;
  index_desc(index_counter) := UPPER(pv_table_name);
  index_counter := index_counter + 1;
 
  FOR i IN index_name(UPPER(pv_table_name)) LOOP
 
    -- Assign the index name to the collection.
    index_desc.EXTEND;
    index_desc(index_counter) := LPAD(i.index_name,2 + LENGTH(i.index_name),' ');
 
    -- Set column counter on entry to nested loop.
    column_counter := 1;
 
    FOR j IN index_columns(i.index_name) LOOP
 
      IF column_counter = 1 THEN
 
        -- Increment the column counter, extend space, and concatenate to string.
        column_counter := column_counter + 1;
        index_desc.EXTEND;
        index_desc(index_counter) := index_desc(index_counter) || '(' || LOWER(j.column_name);
 
      ELSE
 
        -- Add a subsequent column to the list.
        index_desc(index_counter) := index_desc(index_counter) || ',' || LOWER(j.column_name);
 
      END IF;
 
    END LOOP;
 
    -- Append a close parenthesis and incredment index counter.
    index_desc(index_counter) := index_desc(index_counter) || ')';
    index_counter := index_counter + 1;
 
  END LOOP;
 
  -- Return the array.
  RETURN index_desc;
END;
/

You can call the function with this syntax:

SELECT column_value AS "TRANSACTION INDEXES"
FROM   TABLE(display_indexes('TRANSACTION'));

It returns the following formatted output for the TRANSACTION table, which is much nicer than the SQL output. Unfortunately, it will take more effort to place it on par with the show index from table_name; in MySQL.

TRANSACTION INDEXES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRANSACTION
  PK_TRANSACTION(transaction_id)
  UQ_TRANSACTION(rental_id,transaction_type,transaction_date,payment_method_type,payment_account_number,transaction_account)

As always, I hope it helps folks.

Written by maclochlainn

June 22nd, 2010 at 1:28 am

A \G Option for Oracle?

with 6 comments

The \G option in MySQL lets you display rows of data as sets with the columns on the left and the data on the write. I figured it would be fun to write those for Oracle when somebody pointed out that they weren’t out there in cyberspace (first page of a Google search ;-) ).

I started the program with a student’s code. I thought it a bit advanced for the student but didn’t check if he’d snagged it somewhere. Thanks to Niall Litchfield, I now know is came from an earlier post of Tom Kyte. It failed when returning a Blob, BFile, or CFile column.

Naturally, there are two ways to write this. One is a procedure and the other is the function. This post contains both. The procedure is limited because of potential buffer overflows associated with the DBMS_OUTPUT package’s display. A function isn’t limited because you can return a collection from the function.

As usual, I hope this helps folks.

Written by maclochlainn

June 14th, 2010 at 1:01 am

A couple DBMS_SQL limits

without comments

While developing a dynamic SQL example in Oracle 11g that builds a query based on available display columns, I found two interesting error messages. Now instead of noting it for the umpteenth time, I’m documenting it for everybody. The error messages are generated when this DBMS_SQL package’s statement is a SELECT statement, and is executed with either a BLOB, BFILE or CFILE column in the list of returned columns.

26
STATUS := dbms_sql.execute(stmt);

BLOB data type

You get the following error when a column in the query has a BLOB data type. If you alter the query to exclude the column, no error occurs.

BEGIN test('DEMO'); END;
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected NUMBER got BLOB
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 1575
ORA-06512: at "STUDENT.TEST", line 26
ORA-06512: at line 1

BFILE or CFILE data type

You get the following error when a column in the query has a BFILE or CFILE data type. If you alter the query to exclude the column, no error occurs.

BEGIN test('DEMO'); END;
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected NUMBER got FILE
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 1575
ORA-06512: at "STUDENT.TEST", line 26
ORA-06512: at line 1

It’s never a joy to debug the DBMS_SQL package, at least it’s never a joy for me. I hope this helps somebody sort out an issue more quickly.

Written by maclochlainn

June 12th, 2010 at 11:43 pm

User-defined SYS_CONTEXT

without comments

Looking through an error on the web, I notices that the solution is nested in Ask Tom. That’s true for so many solutions, but they likewise have long discussions like this one in the OraFAQ Forum.

It seems that most folks search on is the following. The problem appears to be linked to attempts to call the DBMS_SESSION.SET_CONTEXT directly in their code, instead of through a predefined procedure. The procedure is generally inside a security package in a security schema for reference.

begin
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SESSION", line 94
ORA-06512: at line 2

I figured it might help to provide a simple example because I use VPDs in my second database class, and this is where some of my students get hung up. It strikes me others in the Oracle community may get stuck here too.

  1. Create a user with necessary permissions as the SYSTEM user:
CREATE USER sample IDENTIFIED BY sample;
GRANT CREATE SESSION, CREATE ANY CONTEXT, CREATE ANY PROCEDURE TO sample;
  1. Create the CONTEXT reference as the SAMPLE user, which uses a function to populate the CONTEXT.
CREATE OR REPLACE CONTEXT sample_ctx USING set_context;
  1. Create the function as the SAMPLE user to set the context. The CONTEXT is a literal value inside the procedure with a name and value pair.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE set_context
( pname  VARCHAR2
, pvalue VARCHAR2) IS
BEGIN
  -- Create a session with a previously defined context.
  DBMS_SESSION.SET_CONTEXT('SAMPLE_CTX',pname,pvalue);
END;
/
  1. Set the local session sample_ctx CONTEXT as the SAMPLE user.
EXECUTE set_context('email','sherman@atlanta.org');
  1. You now query the user-defined CONTEXT with case insensitive strings that match the CONTEXT and pname call parameter that you set it. The following shows that query against dual. You should note that it returns a case sensitive string of the pvalue call parameter.
SELECT sys_context('sample_ctx','email') FROM dual;

As always, I hope this helps somebody and saves them time.

Written by maclochlainn

May 5th, 2010 at 8:15 am

Posted in Oracle,Oracle XE,sql

SQL Certified Expert Exam

without comments

I’ve been working with one of my lab tutors to have him take the 1Z0-047 Oracle Database SQL Expert test. He checked out the online practice exam, and found a couple interesting questions and new syntax. At least, it was new to me.

Naturally, I checked it out. I’ve also added it to my online tutorial for the class. Perhaps I’m a creature of habit but a range non-equijion is always a filtered cross product logically. Certainly, the explain plans indicate that this new syntax has zero performance change over the other forms.

I once used the comma-delimited tables (like everybody else), but now I try to always use the newer CROSS JOIN syntax. In both cases the range join is put in the WHERE clause. The new syntax uses an INNER JOIN and an ON clause to hold the range match. Examples of all are below.

Comma-delimited Filtered Cross Join

1
2
3
4
5
SELECT   c.month_short_name
,        t.transaction_amount
FROM     calendar_join c, transaction_join t
WHERE    t.transaction_date BETWEEN c.start_date AND c.end_date
ORDER BY EXTRACT(MONTH FROM t.transaction_date);

Filtered CROSS JOIN

1
2
3
4
5
SELECT   c.month_short_name
,        t.transaction_amount
FROM     calendar_join c CROSS JOIN transaction_join t
WHERE    t.transaction_date BETWEEN c.start_date AND c.end_date
ORDER BY EXTRACT(MONTH FROM t.transaction_date);

Range filtered INNER JOIN

1
2
3
4
5
SELECT   c.month_short_name
,        t.transaction_amount
FROM     calendar_join c INNER JOIN transaction_join t
ON      (t.transaction_date BETWEEN c.start_date AND c.end_date)
ORDER BY EXTRACT(MONTH FROM t.transaction_date);

Without an INDEX on the start and end date of the CALENDAR_JOIN table, the Oracle explain plan for all three queries is:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Query Plan
----------------------------------------------
SELECT STATEMENT   Cost = 9
  SORT ORDER BY
    MERGE JOIN
      SORT JOIN
        TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANSACTION_JOIN
      FILTER
        SORT JOIN
          TABLE ACCESS FULL CALENDAR_JOIN

Naturally, an INDEX on the START_DATE and END_DATE columns improves performance. The results again for all three are the same.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Query Plan
----------------------------------------------
SELECT STATEMENT   Cost = 6
  SORT ORDER BY
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID CALENDAR_JOIN
      NESTED LOOPS
        TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANSACTION_JOIN
        INDEX RANGE SCAN DATE_RANGE

Unless I’m missing something, it looks like its only a matter of style. However, make sure you know that new one because it appears that it’s on the OCP exam. ;-)

Comments are always welcome …

Written by maclochlainn

March 17th, 2010 at 9:34 pm

Multiple Column Lookups?

with 2 comments

I’ve been working with Oracle so long, sometimes it’s frustrating when I find a syntax feature isn’t in another database. I ran into another example tonight. There isn’t a multiple column look up operator in MySQL. For example, you can do this in Oracle:

1
2
3
4
5
DELETE FROM common_lookup
WHERE  (common_lookup_table,common_lookup_column) IN
         (('TRANSACTION','PAYMENT_METHOD_TYPE')
         ,('TRANSACTION','TRANSACTION_TYPE')
         ,('RENTAL_ITEM','RENTAL_ITEM_TYPE'));

When I transformed it to comply with MySQL, it seems just as clean. In fact, with strings it’s simpler.

1
2
3
DELETE FROM common_lookup
WHERE  common_lookup_table IN ('TRANSACTION','RENTAL_ITEM')
AND    common_lookup_column IN ('TRANSACTION_TYPE','PAYMENT_METHOD_TYPE','RENTAL_ITEM_TYPE');

Then, I thought about it. Oracle would let me write a single subquery returning the two columns, whereas MySQL requires two subqueries in their syntax. Likewise, MySQL doesn’t support the WITH clause, which would let me reference a single query result in the scope of the master query (Oracle and SQL Server do support that).

I guess we can hope that Oracle will implement the feature in MySQL now that they own it. :-) Let me know if I’ve missed some fabulous syntax alternative.

Written by maclochlainn

March 16th, 2010 at 8:00 pm

Wrap a cursor function

with 2 comments

A Gauss posted a question on my from last year’s Utah Oracle User’s Group Training Days presentation. If I understood his question correctly, this should help him work with his legacy code. Honestly, as I wrote the example something Bryn Llewellyn said kept banging around in my head, “Just because we can, doesn’t mean we should.” He was speaking of writing poorly engineered code.

Sometimes, we don’t get the opportunity to re-factor existing code. That leaves us with writing wrappers that aren’t pretty or effective. A realization and preface to showing everyone how to accomplish these tasks, and perhaps a watch out warning if you choose this path. I suspect that there may be a better way but I don’t know their code tree.

Here’s the question, as I understand it. They’ve got a library function in PL/SQL that returns a system reference cursor and is principally consumed by an external Java program. This type of architecture is more or less an Adapter OOAD pattern that I wrote about here, over a year and a half ago. The question comes to how to you wrap this approach and make it work in PL/SQL natively too.

The answer depends on some earlier posts because I don’t have a great deal of time to write new examples. It uses a COMMON_LOOKUP table, which is more or less a bunch of small tables grouped into a big table for use in user interaction forms. That way the values don’t get lost in a large code base and are always consistently maintained. These types of tables exist in all major ERP and CRM applications.

The base code for the example is found here, where I discussed how you can effectively use object tables – collections of user-defined object types (Oracle 9iR2 forward if I remember correctly). You can grab the full code at the bottom of the page by clicking the Code Script widget to unfold the code. That code also depends on the Oracle Database 11g PL/SQL Programming downloadable code, which you can download by clicking the link to the zip file location.

Here are the steps to wrap a function that returns a PL/SQL reference cursor so that it can also return a PL/SQL associative array.

  1. Create a package specification to hold all the components that are required to manage the process. Assuming that they may have anchored the system reference cursor to something other than a table like a shared cursor, which is a cumbersome implementation design. (I actually chose to exclude this from the book because it’s a stretch as a good coding practice. At least, it is from my perspective. Also, I couldn’t find an example in the Oracle documentation, which led me to believe they didn’t think it’s a great idea either or I could have glossed over it.) You should note that the PL/SQL RECORD, Associative Array (collection), and the REF CURSOR are defined in this package specification.
-- Create a package to hold the PL/SQL record structure.
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE example IS
 
  -- Force cursors to be read as if empty every time.
  PRAGMA SERIALLY_REUSABLE;
 
  -- Package-level record structure that mimics SQL object type.
  TYPE common_lookup_record IS RECORD
  ( common_lookup_id      NUMBER
  , common_lookup_type    VARCHAR2(30)
  , common_lookup_meaning VARCHAR2(255));
 
  -- Package-level collection that mimics SQL object table.
  TYPE common_lookup_record_table IS TABLE OF common_lookup_record
  INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
 
  -- Cursor structure to support a strongly-typed reference cursor.
  CURSOR c IS
    SELECT   common_lookup_id
    ,        common_lookup_type
    ,        common_lookup_meaning
    FROM     common_lookup;
 
  -- Package-level strongly-typed system reference cursor.
  TYPE cursor_lookup IS REF CURSOR RETURN c%ROWTYPE;
 
END;
/
  1. Write a function to return a strongly typed system reference cursor that’s anchored to a cursor defined in the package. This is fairly straightforward when the package specification is done right. You should notice right away that anchoring the original cursor in the package was a horrible practice because you must repeat it all again in the function. In my opinion, you shouldn’t anchor any system reference cursor explicitly to anything other than a table. The cursor could have used the generic weak cursor data type – SYS_REFCURSOR. Doing so, saves all the extra lines required by a potential shared cursor.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_common_lookup_cursor
( table_name VARCHAR2, column_name VARCHAR2)
RETURN example.cursor_lookup IS
 
  -- Define a local variable of a strongly-typed reference cursor.
  lv_cursor EXAMPLE.CURSOR_LOOKUP;
 
BEGIN
 
  -- Open the cursor from a static cursor
  OPEN lv_cursor FOR
    SELECT common_lookup_id
    ,      common_lookup_type
    ,      common_lookup_meaning
    FROM   common_lookup
    WHERE  common_lookup_table = table_name
    AND    common_lookup_column = column_name;
 
  -- Return the cursor handle.
  RETURN lv_cursor;
 
END;
/
  1. Write a wrapper function that takes the reference cursor as a formal parameter and returns an Associative Array. You should note that this can’t be called from a SQL context. You must only use it in a PL/SQL context because system reference cursors are PL/SQL only data types.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION convert_common_lookup_cursor
( pv_cursor EXAMPLE.CURSOR_LOOKUP) 
RETURN example.common_lookup_record_table IS
 
  -- Declare a local counter variable.
  counter INTEGER := 1;
 
  -- Local PL/SQL-only variable.
  out_record  EXAMPLE.COMMON_LOOKUP_RECORD;
  out_table   EXAMPLE.COMMON_LOOKUP_RECORD_TABLE;
 
BEGIN
 
  -- Grab the cursor wrapper and return values to a PL/SQL-only record collection.
  LOOP
    FETCH pv_cursor INTO out_record;
    EXIT WHEN pv_cursor%NOTFOUND;
 
    -- Assign it one row at a time to an associative array.
    out_table(counter) := out_record;
 
    -- Increment the counter.
    counter := counter + 1;
 
  END LOOP;
 
  -- Return the record collection.
  RETURN out_table;
 
END;
/
  1. You can test the program in an anonymous block, like the one below. It defines a local Associative Array variable and then assigns the system reference cursor through the wrapper.
-- Open the session to see output from PL/SQL blocks.
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
 
DECLARE
 
  -- Define a local associative array.
  process_table  EXAMPLE.COMMON_LOOKUP_RECORD_TABLE;
 
BEGIN
  -- Print title block.
  dbms_output.put_line('Converting a SYS_REFCURSOR to TABLE');
  dbms_output.put_line('---------------------------------------------------');
 
  -- Run the dynamic variables through the cursor generating function and then convert it.
  process_table := convert_common_lookup_cursor(get_common_lookup_cursor('ITEM','ITEM_TYPE'));
 
  -- Read the content of the Associative array.  
  FOR i IN 1..process_table.COUNT LOOP
    dbms_output.put('['||process_table(i).common_lookup_id||']');
    dbms_output.put('['||process_table(i).common_lookup_type||']');
    dbms_output.put_line('['||process_table(i).common_lookup_meaning||']');
  END LOOP;
 
END;
/

I hope this answers Gauss’s question. While writing it, I could envision another question that might pop-up. How do you convert an object table type to a PL/SQL context. It was an omission not to include it in that original post on object table types. Here’s how you wrap an object table type into a PL/SQL scope collection.

You might have guessed. It’s done with another wrapper function. At least this is the easiest way to convert the SQL data type to a PL/SQL data type that I see. If you’ve another approach, a better way, let us know.

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_common_lookup_record_table
( table_name  VARCHAR2
, column_name VARCHAR2 )
RETURN example.common_lookup_record_table IS
 
  -- Declare a local counter variable.
  counter INTEGER := 1;
 
  -- Define a dynamic cursor that takes two formal parameters.
  CURSOR c (table_name_in VARCHAR2, table_column_name_in VARCHAR2) IS
    SELECT   *
    FROM     TABLE(get_common_lookup_object_table(UPPER(table_name_in),UPPER(table_column_name_in)));
 
  -- A local PL/SQL-only collection variable.
  list EXAMPLE.COMMON_LOOKUP_RECORD_TABLE;
 
BEGIN
 
  -- Grab the cursor wrapper and return values to a PL/SQL-only record collection.
  FOR i IN c(table_name, column_name) LOOP
    list(counter) := i;
    counter := counter + 1;
  END LOOP;
 
  -- Return the record collection.
  RETURN list;
END get_common_lookup_record_table;
/

You can then test this in an anonymous block, like so:

-- Open the session to see output from PL/SQL blocks.
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
 
DECLARE
 
  -- Declare a local PL/SQL-only collection and assign the value from the function call.
  list EXAMPLE.COMMON_LOOKUP_RECORD_TABLE;
 
  BEGIN
 
  -- Print title block.
  dbms_output.put_line('Converting a SQL Collection to a PL/SQL Collection');
  dbms_output.put_line('---------------------------------------------------');
 
  -- Assign wrapped SQL collection to a PL/SQL-only collection.
  list := get_common_lookup_record_table('ITEM','ITEM_TYPE');
 
  -- Call the record wrapper function.
  FOR i IN 1..list.COUNT LOOP
    dbms_output.put('['||list(i).common_lookup_id||']');
    dbms_output.put('['||list(i).common_lookup_type||']');
    dbms_output.put_line('['||list(i).common_lookup_meaning||']');
  END LOOP;
 
END;
/

As always, I hope this helps somebody without paying a fee for content. ;-)

Written by maclochlainn

March 7th, 2010 at 9:14 pm

Stable set of rows?

without comments

My students are into the upload lab and they’ve encountered the wonderful ORA-30926 error from a MERGE statement. An example of the MERGE for an upload is in this earlier blog post.

This is the wonderful error message, which doesn’t seem to have meaning for many. The key is the non-deterministic where clauses phrase. That phrase means that the the query inside the USING clause returns a non-unique set of rows. The returned rows can’t be matched uniquely against the target table in the ON clause. The ON clause is where the MERGE statment matches the source query’s rows against the target table’s rows.

The problem is very much like when you write what you think is a single-row subquery but find out it’s actually a multiple-row subquery when it return an ORA-01422 error in Oracle.

As a rule, I’ve found that using the DISTINCT operator in the source SELECT statement fixes it most of the time. Alternatively, you need to re-examine the logic of your WHERE clause.

Error: ORA-30926
Text:  Unable TO get a stable SET of rows IN the source TABLES.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Cause:  A stable SET of rows could NOT be got because of large dml 
        activity OR a non-deterministic WHERE clause. 
 
Action: Remove any non-deterministic WHERE clauses AND reissue the dml.

Hope this helps my students and others … ;-)

Written by maclochlainn

March 5th, 2010 at 1:43 am

Posted in Oracle,Oracle XE,sql